Some questions become essays. Others turn into little worlds you can enter. This is a quieter place to see the threads currently visible in my public work—without pretending every day needs a headline.
Last updated: Field note / 001
A dated selection of public projects and writing, assembled from pages checked on 23 October 2026. Not a real-time activity feed.
PUBLIC-SOURCE EDITIONThings you can actually open
Recent public experiments. Being on this page means they are available to explore, not that every one is receiving daily updates.
A fictional reporting room where an observation can become a story—and a story can become an institutional decision.
A question keeps surfacing: when information moves through people, who gets to frame it? This playable experiment offers three invented cases. It is a thought experiment, not empirical evidence about actual organisations.
A small imaginary city that emerges near the boundary between light and shadow.
You change the conditions, rather than ordering the inhabitants around. The rules are fictional, but the question—what emerges when a system has its own constraints?—is real and worth playing with.
A miniature shop-world for exploring cash, trust, trade-offs and the difference between a model and a lived economy.
The ledger makes fictional transactions visible. It intentionally separates authored teaching assumptions from measured facts about real customers or a real family business.
Questions that refuse to sit still
These are visible themes in the writing and research pages, not claims about a formal study presently underway.
The Identity–Action Gap asks what gets between intentions, friction and actual behaviour.
A useful distinction: a conceptual model can organise a question without having validated the answer. This thread is about making behavioural explanations clearer, not declaring a universal law.
A published essay argues for human development over the endless guessing game of which skills will be fashionable next.
The future of work is uncertain. Better questions might concern judgment, curiosity, adaptability and the kind of people our institutions help us become.
A shelf for the curious reader
A personal current-reading log hasn't been author-confirmed. For now, this shelf offers two public essays to read rather than guessing which books are on my desk.
A public essay about authorship, thinking and our relationship with increasingly capable tools.
This is writing offered to readers, not a claim that every thought on the page has a final answer. It is one way into the creative-technology thread.
An inquiry into how consensus, familiarity and power can become mistaken for certainty.
The recurring question is not whether agreement matters, but whether agreement alone can settle what is true. It pairs naturally with the Hearsay Department.
Threads worth returning to
Old questions are allowed to stay open. These are connected public works, not a promise of a new release date.
The Olfactory Cathedral separates a designed accord from what a person actually smells, remembers and infers.
This creative instrument sits near House of Venus, where perception and expression meet craft. Its ratios are conceptual teaching materials—not a safety-tested perfume recipe.
The Sound of Becoming treats identity as an editable score rather than one neat final story.
The experience uses original rhythms and fictionalised reflections. It is creative work, not a personality test or a psychological assessment.
An explanation, not a manifesto
Think of it as a dated postcard from an ongoing body of work: what is publicly available to explore, which questions connect, and what might be worth reading. It is not a status tracker, a résumé, an official research report or a promise to publish on a schedule.
Each entry links to a public original. The dates on cards mark when the projects were checked for this edition, not necessarily created that day. The field notes are editorial descriptions of the linked work. Follow the original page for full context.
The linked project pages and essays above are the primary sources for this edition. For wider context on the underlying questions, the following independent readings are useful starting points—not proof that the artistic experiments scientifically validate anything:
Somewhere to go next
Read an essay, try an experiment, or wander back into the larger universe. No streak to maintain. No productivity badge to collect.